Case Analysis
27th Feb, 2014
The existing system of maintaining land records in India establishes at best a presumptive title of the owner.
27th Feb, 2014
All these controversies related to land acquisition have made it a political issue but nonetheless all these amendments in the land acquisition laws have failed to please the population
27th Feb, 2014
Real estate Industry, very recently, suffered a set back wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority VsDevender Kumar set aside the acquisition of land situated in a village […]
27th Feb, 2014
Sale is perhaps the most popular mode of transfer of immovable property in India. Gift and Exchange are the other modes which transfer the rights, titles and interest in the property with immediate effect.
27th Feb, 2014
There is often a confusion while seeking partition of properties amongst Hindu families, whether parties should opt for a partition deed or a family settlement.
27th Feb, 2014
It is only the “drawer” of the cheque who can be made liable for the penal action under the provisions of the N.I. Act and as law is well settled, a strict interpretation is required […]
21st Feb, 2014
The writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is a very effective and powerful remedy available in law
21st Feb, 2014
Scope and meaning of the expression Shared Household vis-à-vis question as to whether in the property (ies) wherever the husband and wife lived together last becomes falls under the definition of shared household .
21st Feb, 2014
In the judgment as passed by the Supreme Court in Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. SAW Pipes Ltd. [AIR2003SC2629] dated 17.04.2003 the Court dealt with the issue relating to determination of compensation for […]
21st Feb, 2014
Issue relating to Registration of Partnership firm formed by two Hindu Undivided Families for the purposes of provisions of the Income Tax Act and conditions necessary in connection related thereto.
21st Feb, 2014
While a Public Authority cannot distribute State largesse arbitrarily, and all the eligible persons have to be allowed level playing field
21st Feb, 2014
The third proviso also does not bar or prohibit the Revenue or departmental representative from making a statement that they would not take coercive steps to recover the impugned demand