The Ld. National Company Law Appellant Tribunal held that the Registrar has to follow the due process as mentioned under Section 248 of the Companies Act 2013 and serve a proper notice to the company, […]
The Apex court reiterated that benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable to a proceeding under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the time period of thirty […]
The Ld. National Company Law Appellant Tribunal after observing the amendments in Section 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 held that the amendment brought under the said section by amending the words “seventy […]
The Supreme Court held that if the interests of the co-defendants are separate, a suit will abate under Order XXII Rule 4 of CPC only as regards the particular interest of the deceased party, however […]
The Delhi High Court affirmed that compliance of Section 13(3A) of the SARFAESI Act is mandatory however, the period of fifteen days provided to the lender for responding to the objections of the borrower is […]
The Delhi High Court has held that jurisdiction to execute foreign arbitration award continues with the High Court, despite the change in pecuniary jurisdiction as per 2015 amendment to Delhi High Court Act. The said […]
The Supreme Court has held that any challenge to the arbitrator appointed should be raised before the arbitrator himself under Section 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 in the first instance and thereafter […]
The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi while interpreting Rule 3 of the Delhi High Court Rules 2018 read with Orders VII, VIII and XI of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 held that in the […]
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court, held that enjoyment of a property without payment of any charges by the occupier who is not an owner is impermissible. The said ruling was delivered in […]
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a revision petition is not maintainable against an appeal in enforcement proceedings in a consumer dispute. The said ruling was held in the matter of K.A Nagamani Vs. […]
The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi rejected the contention of the Appellant challenging the dismissal of his application under Order IX Rule 13 by the Trial Court. The Delhi Court held that the litigant owes […]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that a dispute raised for the first time in reply to demand notice or in response to Adjudicating Authority regarding quality of goods will not amount to […]