The Delhi High Court in the case of M/s ICICI Bank Limited vs Nidhi Sharma (CM (M) 1814/2019) decided on 23.12.2019 held that the Bank would be entitled to sell the hypothecated vehicle where the […]
The above-mentioned reasoning was pronounced by the Bombay High Court in the matter of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Sushama Mahendra Sonwane (FA. No. 28929 of 2014) on 20.12.2019. Facts: The Appeal […]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal) in the matter of Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tata Sons Ltd. & Anr. (Appeal No. 254/2018), decided on 18.12.2019, has reiterated the […]
The Supreme Court in the case of “Munish Kakkar vs Nidhi Kakkar” (Civil Appeal No. 9318 of 2014) decided on 17.12.2019 has reiterated its earlier position that in exercise of its inherent powers under Article […]
Supreme Court in the case of DAV Public School vs The Senior Manager, Indian Bank, Midnapur Branch & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 9352 of 2019 arising out of SLP(C) No. 3738 of 2019) decided on […]
The Supreme Court has held, in the absence of counsel for the appellant, appeal may, if the Court deems fit, be dismissed in default but the same cannot be heard and decided on merits. The […]
The Delhi High Court held that if a party fails in leading evidence in the first place and is only trying to fill up lacunae by seeking rebuttal evidence, the same is not permitted.. The […]
The Supreme Court has disapproved the practice of summoning officers by the High Court while considering the writ petitions which impugns the order passed by the said officers. The said ruling was held in the […]
Time spent in proceedings pursued under SARFESI, is entitled to be excluded in later proceedings filed under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, in terms of Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963. The only […]
Supreme Court while upholding the powers of the High Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has discouraged the use of the same in proceedings challenging orders passed by civil Court in proceedings […]
The Supreme Court has observed that issue regarding limitation would be decided by the arbitrator under section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as Act) and not the High Court at […]
The Court further held that “resignation” has the effect of termination of an employee and entails consequences different from that of “voluntary retirement” and pension cannot be claimed in the former case. The above ratio […]